In the seven years before his marriage to Clara Wieck in 1840, Robert Schumann created some of his greatest solo piano works, including the First and Second piano sonatas, Kreisleriana, Kinderszenen, and the C-Major Fantasy. Schumann’s infatuation with Clara—a budding pianist-composer who was 10 years his junior—found expression in almost everything he wrote; her father’s implacable opposition to the match only succeeded in making their hearts grow fonder. As Robert lived in Leipzig and Clara in Vienna, the young lovers were obliged to conduct their clandestine courtship largely through letters and music. With characteristic impetuousness, Schumann declared that his Sonata No. 1 in F-sharp Minor, Op. 11, was “a cry from my heart to yours.”
Schumann wrote the Arabeske during a seven-month sojourn in Vienna between October 1838 and April 1839. Although his hopes of settling there permanently with Clara were soon dashed, he put his time in the Austrian capital to good use by composing and revising a cluster of piano pieces. Among them were three that he described in a letter to a friend as “a Humoreske, to be sure of a more melancholy sort, and a Blumenstück and an Arabeske, which are of less importance; the titles say all there is to know, and I am quite blameless that the stems and fronds are so frail and delicate.” Compared to the fiercely challenging Humoreske, the lightweight Arabeske makes only moderate demands on the pianist’s technique. With an eye on the lucrative amateur market, Schumann said he aspired to become “the favorite composer of all the ladies of Vienna.”
The repetitive, rondo-like structure of the Arabeske (A-B-A-C-A) recalls an earlier title that Schumann apparently considered and rejected: “Rondelett.” The recurring A section consists of delicate, rippling figurations in C major, a key traditionally associated with simplicity and artlessness. Schumann modulates to E minor for a more sedate interlude, then returns to the opening music by way of a ruminative transition. A second minor-key excursion ensues, this time in A minor, briefer and more forceful in character than the first. A final statement of the rondo theme is followed by a tender, dreamy coda.
Johann Sebastian Bach spent most of his life as a hard-working church musician, tirelessly turning out a prodigious quantity of organ music, cantatas, passions, motets, and other sacred works. But contemporaries knew him best as a celebrated virtuoso on the organ and harpsichord. He composed a wide range of secular instrumental music, from large-scale orchestral suites and concertos to unaccompanied works for sundry instruments. Much of this repertoire—probably including the Goldberg Variations—was featured on the public concerts that Bach organized at a popular coffeehouse in Leipzig in his capacity as director of the local collegium musicum (a university-based, professional-amateur ensemble) in the 1730s and ’40s.
Much like his compositions, Bach’s keyboard playing reflected a synthesis of the learned and heavily contrapuntal German idiom; the melodious, extraverted Italian style; and the French penchant for florid, speech-like arioso. He studied and admired the works of François Couperin and his fellow claveciniste composers, whose harpsichord music demanded exceptional lightness and evenness of touch to achieve its characteristic blend of delicacy and brilliance. Bach’s first biographer, Johann Nikolaus Forkel, noted the economy of his keyboard technique: “Bach is said to have played with so easy and small a motion of the fingers that it was hardly perceptible. Only the first joints of the fingers were in motion; the hand retained even in the most difficult passages its rounded form; the fingers rose very little from the keys, hardly more than in a trill, and when one was employed, the other remained quietly in its position. Still less did the other parts of his body take any share in his play, as happens with many whose hand is not light enough.”
One of Bach’s secrets was an innovative system of fingering that placed the hitherto subordinate thumbs on par with the other digits as principal fingers. This enabled him not only to range with ease across the full spectrum of keys, some of which had traditionally been held to lie awkwardly under the fingers, but also to invest the inner lines of his music with greater complexity and textural interest. In sum, Forkel wrote that Bach “at length acquired such a high degree of facility and, we may almost say, unlimited power over his instrument in all the keys that difficulties almost ceased to exist for him. As well in his unpremeditated [that is, improvised] fantasies as in executing his compositions (in which it is well known that all the fingers of both hands are constantly employed, and have to make motions which are as strange and uncommon as the melodies themselves), he is said to have possessed such certainty that he never missed a note.”
As a consummate improviser, Bach naturally excelled at the art of variation—an art as old as music itself. After all, what could be simpler than presenting a short, recognizable theme and then varying or elaborating on it, so that the listener hears the same basic idea again and again, each time with increasing familiarity, understanding, and enjoyment? The principle of variation is central to the forms and procedures of Western music. It underlies the repeating bass patterns of the Renaissance chaconne, the ornate da capo arias of Baroque opera, the elegant symmetries of Classical sonata form, and even the verse-and-refrain structure of popular song forms. The impulse to balance unity with variety runs throughout music history, from medieval dances to Beethoven’s “Diabelli” Variations, and from the virtuosic concert variations of the 19th century to modern works like Steve Reich’s 1979 Variations for Winds, Strings, and Keyboards.
For Bach and his contemporaries in the early 18th century, the ostinato (or ground) bass provided a ready-made framework for variations in the form of countless chaconnes, passacaglias, and other works. For example, the majestic architecture of the great Chaconne from Bach’s Partita No. 2 in D Minor for unaccompanied violin rests on the simplest and sturdiest of foundations: Its 256 bars are supported by a repeated but ever-changing bass line that serves as the harmonic underpinning for a series of stunningly imaginative variations. According to Forkel, it was “the constant sameness of the fundamental harmony” that prompted middle-aged Bach to reject variation writing as “an ungrateful task.” Nevertheless, the composer returned to this kind of writing late in life in such masterpieces as the Canonic Variations on the Christmas chorale Vom Himmel hoch, the Crucifixus movement of the B-Minor Mass, The Art of Fugue, and above all, the Goldberg Variations.
The Goldberg Variations is the fourth and final part of Bach’s Clavier-Übung (Keyboard Practice). This composite work is not a set of exercises, as the title suggests, but a wide-ranging survey of mid–18th-century keyboard styles, genres, and forms. Published in four installments between 1731 and 1741, it gave Bach an opportunity to display his prowess as a composer and performer alike. Part One consists of six partitas (sometimes called the German Suites) for single-manual harpsichord. Part Two—written, like the Goldberg Variations, for a harpsichord with two manuals—comprises a bravura “concerto after the Italian taste” (the so-called Italian Concerto), and a more suavely ornate “overture after the French manner.” Part Three is a compendium of chorales and other pieces for organ.
The title page of Part Four describes its contents as “an aria with diverse variations … composed for music lovers, to refresh their spirits.” But Bach may have had a more specific recipient in mind: Count Hermann Karl von Keyserlingk, the Russian envoy to the Dresden court, who visited Leipzig regularly in the company of his house harpsichordist, Johann Gottlieb Goldberg, one of Bach’s star pupils. Forkel recalls that “the Count was often sickly, and then had sleepless nights. At these times Goldberg, who lived in the house with him, had to pass the night in an adjoining room to play something to him when he could not sleep. The Count once said to Bach that he should like to have some clavier pieces for his Goldberg, which should be of such a soft and somewhat lively character that he might be a little cheered up by them in his sleepless nights.”
Although Forkel’s account is now considered apocryphal—for one thing, as Bach scholar Christoph Wolff points out, Goldberg was a mere boy of 12 or 13 when the work was composed—the name Goldberg Variations has stuck. Performers never tire of the work’s infinite variety, and Bach’s music has lost none of its power to soothe and refresh the listener’s spirits.
“In my beginning is my end”—T. S. Eliot’s refrain from the poem “East Coker”—neatly describes the musical excursion on which Bach takes the listener in the Goldberg Variations. The work begins and ends with a tenderly luminous aria in G major that is itself a miniature set of variations: The first eight bars trace a descending bass pattern that Bach ingeniously teases out to 32 bars. The music’s slow, measured tread is varied by grace notes, turns, trills, crisp “snap” rhythms, and a final cascade of rippling passagework. The 16th-note motion continues in the first of the ensuing 30 variations, this time in the context of a lively two-part invention. Next comes a three-part invention, built on a distinctive upward leap of a fourth, followed by a “canon at the unison,” in which the two upper voices play follow-the-leader.
Bach proceeds to replicate this tripartite scheme throughout the work: Each group of three variations culminates in a canon, with the voices imitating each other at intervals that increase incrementally from unison to a ninth. Such mathematical precision is characteristic of Bach, a devout Lutheran who believed deeply in numbers and proportions as symbols of divine perfection. Yet this predetermined framework afforded ample scope for improvisational variety, from the buoyant dotted rhythms of the gigue-like Variation 7 to the intense minor-key introspection of Variation 25 and the toccata-like brilliance of Variation 28.
The centerpiece of the Goldberg Variations, Variation 16, is cast in the form of a miniature French overture, with a broad, majestic introduction and a fast, fugal second part. At this point Bach seems to turn a corner, as the next 12 variations increasingly place a premium on virtuosity. Not until Variation 30 does the composer allow the song-like impulse to come back to the fore in a contrapuntal quodlibet (medley), incorporating snatches of two German folk tunes. The journey ends, as it began, in the glow of pure lyricism as the opening aria returns, identical to the first hearing and yet ineffably transformed.
—Harry Haskell
© 2021 Carnegie Hall